Wie opkomt voor vrijheid steunt vreedzame en vrijwillige uitwisseling tussen mensen en strijdt tegen gewelddadige beperking van deze uitwisseling. Het hoeft echter niet direct te betekenen dat een systeem van vreedzame, vrijwillige uitwisseling “kapitalisme” genoemd hoeft te worden. Er zijn uiteraard sommigen die vinden dat dit overduidelijk is wat “kapitalisme” betekent. Ik kan ook niet…

State violence thrives in the dark. This is why the state secrets privilege is so abused, it’s why the Obama administration has viciously persecuted whistleblowers, and it’s why states benefit from a  media climate where their legitimacy is assumed and radical ideas aren’t heard. So today I want to highlight some people both inside and…

Julia Angwin (“Has Privacy Become a Luxury Good?”, The New York Times, 4 de março) relata as dificuldades enfrentadas pelas pessoas que tentam manter a privacidade de seus dados. Embora os indivíduos possam comprar bens e serviços para esse fim, seu alto custo diminui sua utilidade e disponibilidade. Não são produtos caros apenas no sentido…

Dahr Jamail discusses the civilian deaths caused by the Iraqi government siege of Fallujah. John B. Judis reviews Maximalist: America in the World from Truman to Obama. Brittney Wheeler discusses why liberty doesn’t need politics. The LA Times editorial board discusses why the embargo on Cuba should be ended. Karen J. Greenberg discusses 5 issues…

By its own recent report’s framing and that of the Washington Post’s Howard Schneider (“Communists Have Seized the IMF,” February 26), the International Monetary Fund has apparently gone soft on “redistribution.” But that framing is wrong. Both the IMF report (“Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth,” IMF Discussion Note SDN/14/02, February 2014) and Schneider’s write-up of it conflate “redistribution”…

Julia Angwin (“Has Privacy Become a Luxury Good?” New York Times, March 4),  describes the difficulties faced by people trying to maintain the privacy of their personal data. Although an individual can purchase goods and services for the purpose, high cost mitigates their usefulness and availability, not only in the monetary sense but in the amount of…

“愚蠢——是会让人头痛的！” 那只是一种比喻。但是在有些情况下却是毫不夸张的事实。Bob Garfield写的情人节的情书（“我爱大政府”， Slate, 2月15日）就极端地接近于此。相比之下顽固的右派分子更加容易被容忍。他们热爱政府做的可怕的事情因为他们本身就是令人厌烦的人。他们深知政府就是关于一群穿着制服的恶棍到处威胁和杀害人。他们陶醉于其，因为他们是通过霍布斯政治哲学，沾满鲜血的獠牙与利爪，戴着有色眼镜来看这个世界。中立或左派的软蛋们则试着去用正面的，关怀的，“为什么妈咪是民主党”之类的修辞来形容政府，这让人非常的反胃。 最糟糕的是Garfield像大多数中立——左派人士一样无法辨别到底他认为“好的”事情（路易斯安那购地， “保护民众免受恐怖袭击”等等）和他觉得是失误的事（维护奴隶制度一个世纪， 美国中央情报局推翻外国政府等等）是多么紧密的结合在一起的。 Garfield对政府“结束奴隶制度”大加赞扬，同时推脱说它之前对奴隶制度的维护是不需要作出解释的。但是对奴隶制度的维护是最初宪法安排的固有本性，而且可能会永远的持续下去如果不是因为一连串的意外。奴隶制度的废除全部应该归功于这些意外。1860年的民主党是一个支持奴隶制的政党，并且种种迹象表明会一直长期的继续下去。他们失败了只是因为那些一心用偏执和无理来支持奴隶制的狂热分子与适度的支持奴隶制的大多数人决裂了，从而让林肯赢了总统选举。但是即使林肯是总统他们还是会得到一个永久的民主党占多数的国会，这将把林肯贬谪成一只跛脚鸭，把共和党写到历史的注脚，如果不是因为美国深南部的赞成奴隶制的狂热分子愚蠢到要脱离联邦，从而给予共和党多数治理权。1850年的美国政府是保护奴隶制的一个强而有力的堡垒。它拥有较严厉的逃跑奴隶法，严密的审查废除奴隶制的宣传信件而且对参议院就废奴隶制相关的辩论发出禁言令。所以奴隶制度应该会永远持续下去，如果不是因为赞成奴隶制的力量一方本身的愚蠢。 同样令人哭笑不得的是Garfield看不到“好的”路易斯安那购地，坏的奴隶制和坏的血泪之路之间的联系。杰斐逊总统购地主要是为了促进老西南部的农学家们的利益，他们想要免费在密西西比河上航行，也想通过新奥尔良给他们的经济作物的出口找一条安全的线路。你知道，就跟贪图“文明化五部族”的土地，后来安德鲁-杰克逊把土地给了他们的那些贪婪的农民是一样的。 至于“有保证的向西扩张”一事，这让我该从何说起呢？ 嗯，我真的不应该指出这一点，但是在购买之前，路易斯安那领地已经有人居住了。而且出售所得的款项被拿破仑用于支持对海地的奴隶争取自由进行的大规模屠杀。 Garfield像大多数无知的自由派人士一样赞扬“进步”的政府措施却不知这些措施完全服务于财阀和大公司的利益，比如像汉密尔顿提倡的“还清革命战争的债务。” 哦，对了，比较左派的历史学家查尔斯-比尔德和Merrill Jenson 对从满面灰尘的农民那里征税，然后按面值价还给持有这些债劵的富有的投机者，而这些人仅以几便士的打折价买了这些债劵一事有话要说。 “先进的”横贯大陆的铁路也许是美国历史上最大的企业福利计划，不仅有政府债劵的资助同时也有政府免费赠予铁路公司相当于法国面积大小的批地。政府补贴长途运输的直接后果是中央企业经济在19世纪后期迅速成长和电力被大规模生产工厂而不是分散型的的地方工业区所采用。 《宅地法》并不是一种“土地重新分配计划”。西部土地的合法拥有者——也就是指真正空置的还没有被印地安人所使用的那部份——应该是使用了那片土地却没有得到任何人许可的拓荒者。相反的，美国政府独占了依据《瓜达卢佩——伊达尔戈割地条约》应是墨西哥的土地，选择了一小部分给移民定居，余下的储备为铁路批地或者以优惠的价格和条件租给伐木，牧场，矿石与石油开采。因此就美国政府的土地政策而言，如果说它允许了任何的开垦和移民， 不如说它也只是允许事情顺其自然的发生。但有些人却因此给予该政策许多感谢。其实大部分的分配计划的目的是为采掘业谋取福利。 以汇丰银行“助长贩毒集团洗钱”的不法行为当例子是特别的滑稽有趣。你知道还有谁对洗钱感兴趣吗？中央情报局。 它用洗来的钱去支持世界各地的黑色行动例如用资金赞助中美州的敢死队。 将“防恐怖袭击”和“失误的行为”比方说中央情报局推翻外国政府放在一起相提并论实在是令人哭笑不得。如果不是美国持续性的推翻政府，支持军事独裁和全世界的敢死队——这一所作所为都是为了保护跨国公司的利益不受地方工厂的干扰——以及自1948年起成为种族隔离状态的巴勒斯坦的最忠实的盟友和资助者， 现在根本不会有任何恐怖分子。 政府并没有“保护人民大众不受垄断的侵害”。 它通过法律限制竞争从而造成垄断。被资助的基础设施项目，如国家铁路系统，民航（全部由政府基金创建）和州际铁路的建设使公司可以将长途运输和批发成本外部化给大众从而将实力达到全国范伟内的巩固和扩张。 “知识产权法”允许公司通过卡特尔的方式进行专利的交流和汇集（例如通用电器和西屋）。这些专利和商标至今还使跨国公司对实际生产产品的血汗工厂实行控制，同时给在越南只需花五美元的鞋加上二百美元的商标费。 在他所举的例子中有一个Garfield倒是触及了真相——不过他认为是一件好事。他错误的以为是政府在“自由企业”的成长中起到了作用。通过资助基础设施和社会化人力资源再生的成本去帮助“将女人当男人用，将男人当牲口用”的大企业。是的，政府确实起了作用。但我认为支撑着大企业的统治是一件坏事。 那些社会安全网计划又是怎么回事呢？他们是次要的反措施，在小幅度范围内试图去抵消企业通过国家强制垄断租金的方式从员工和消费者身上吸金所造成的不良后果。大型企业和财阀从工人，消费者和纳税人身上剥削金钱达到了前所未有的规模完全是依靠美国政府的直接援助和密谋。然后政府从盗来的赃款中拿出一小部分去还给大众，仅仅是为了防止饥饿和无家可归达到最糟糕的程度因此而威胁到资本主义的存亡。 我谢谢你了，山姆大叔。 州政府是一个经济统治阶级的执行委员会，它为百姓做的任何好事都是它做坏事的副作用或者是修正一部分为真正控制它的企业谋利时所造成的混乱。自由派们不理解这些，只有真正的左派，像我们一样的左自由主义者才明白。

California is in its third year of a severe drought. Some scientists believe this will be the driest year in the last five hundred. Among other measures for dealing with the water shortage, the state has announced it will not provide subsidized irrigation water from dams this year. The large-scale capitalist agriculture model touted by…

Justin Raimondo discusses the censoring of Twitter by the Venezuelean government. Greg Grandian discusses slavery. Kelly B. Vlahos discusses the Afghan election. Lenni Brenner discusses Zionist outreach to Nazi Germany. Jacob Sullum discusses myths surrounding meth. Jim Naureckas discusses media coverage of Venezuela. Patrick Cockburn discusses the long war in Syria. Mariame Kaba and Erica…

Charles R. Larson discusses the grotesqueries of Iraq. David Swanson discusses the use of Nazi scientists by the U.S. Franklin Lamb discusses getting aid into Homs. Laurence M. Vance discusses ending the American empire. Matt Welch discusses the drug war. Shihka Dalmia discusses closed border policies. William D. Hartung discusses arm sales. Robert Fisk discusses…

The identification of libertarians with conservatives seems never ending. At the recent International Students for Liberty conference Justin Amash equated the two. Many leftists make similar equations with the intent of demonizing libertarians as right-wingers. What is the truth of the matter? We’re most definitely not conservatives. Liberty is a radical and revolutionary idea. One…

“Mentre si prepara a difendersi contro una causa da molti miliardi per violazione di brevetti in Europa,” dice Apple Insider, “la Apple si è allineata alle posizioni della rivale Google nel chiedere alla corte suprema americana pene più severe per i patent troll responsabili di cause frivole.” Era ora. Il problema della Apple, però, è…

Max Borders discusses the rise of the libertarians. Sheldon Richman discusses the sacralization of voting. Ramzy Baroud discusses the implosion of Iraq. Pratap Chatterjee and Tom Engelhardt discuss the surveillance state. Marjorie Cohn discusses the NSA scandal. Wendy McElroy discusses the immorality of government education. Michael S. Rozeff discusses the nation-state. Carlos Clemente discusses Chomsky’s…

“The stupid — it hurts!” That’s just a figure of speech, to be sure, but in some cases it’s almost literally true. Bob Garfield’s Valentine for Big Government (“I Luv Big Gov,” Slate, Feb. 15) comes extremely close. Hard right-wingers are easier to take. They love the awful things government does because they’re awful people….

Norman Solomon recently published a piece about Amazon.com’s connection to the CIA. The CEO of Amazon, Jeff Bezos, claims to be a libertarian, but what kind of libertarian contracts with the CIA? A faux one. It’s not possible to be a libertarian and support one of the most odious agencies of the American state. An…

I have argued before that scarcity is manufactured in many industries by the deliberate cultivation of economic demand through structures of artificial need. Given the importance of technology in these industries it should not be surprising that the manipulation of technological development plays an enormous role in the manufacture of these structures. The idea that…

It was Thomas Hobbes, in his book Leviathan, that declared without a state man is in a constant climate of struggle and fight. He called this the “state of nature” whereby it is a “war of all against all”. He makes a compelling argument for the coming together of all peoples, and the creation of…

C4SS has teamed up with the Distro of the Libertarian Left. The Distro produces and distribute zines and booklets on anarchism, market anarchist theory, counter-economics, and other movements for liberation. For every copy of ALL Distro’s “CAPITALISM” that you purchase through the Distro, C4SS will receive a percentage. Support C4SS with ALL Distro’s “CAPITALISM“. $1.00 for the first copy. $0.60 for every additional…

This has been one of those times that a series of random, seemingly unrelated events have all reinforced a common lesson for me. First, it was reported on January 21 (“Opposed to Fracking? You Might Be a Terrorist,” PopularResistance.org) that Canadian and U.S. law enforcement agencies — Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the Mounties, the…

Ahmad Barqawi discusses American imperialism. William Sheppard discusses state violence and rape. Sheldon Richman discusses how Obama and Kerry are jeopardizing peace with Iran. Max Border discusses the rise of the new libertarians. Murray Dobbin discusses Stephen Harper’s loyalty to Israel. Michael Munger discusses what positive vision libertarians can offer. Laurence M. Vance discusses hard…