STIGMERGY: The C4SS Blog
Calling All Rocky Mountain Anarchists!

Save the Kids, a grassroots, all-volunteer organization dedicated to ending the school-to-prison pipeline, and youth incarceration more broadly, is hosting its first annual Anarchism, Crime, and Justice Conference.

From the event’s description:

Activists and scholars working within the realm of challenging the current punitive criminal justice system are welcome to submit for the 1st Annual Anarchism, Crime, and Justice Conference, an anarchist criminology conference. This conference is structured around challenging and abolishing punitive justice, while promoting community-based alternatives such as restorative justice, transformative justice and Hip Hop battling. This conference welcomes all those interested in providing performances, workshops, lecturers, teach-ins, roundtables, and film screenings. Topics of interest include prison abolition, prisoner support, critiques of political repression, police abolition, de-colonialism, abolition of zero tolerance policies and the school to prison pipeline, all forms of academic repression, corporate repression, state terrorism, all things pertaining to youth justice, total liberation, intersectionality, horizontalism, LGBTTQQIA, mutual aid, disability liberation, Black liberation, indigenous sovereignty, racial justice, animal liberation, environmental justice, green anarchism, anarchism, and justice. This conference also welcomes all forms of art and music for social justice such as Hip Hop activism.

The conference will take place this month, March 26th & 27th, at Fort Lewis College in Durango, Colorado. More details on the location and scheduling can be found at the event’s website.

For more information contact:
Dr. Anthony Nocella
Department of Sociology, Fort Lewis College
nocellat@yahoo.com or 315-657-2911

The Weekly Libertarian Leftist Review 115

Dan Sanchez discusses two books on the Dulles brothers.

Ivan Eland discusses the follies of American foreign policy.

Gary Reed discusses libertarian women.

Jacob G. Hornberger discusses conservatives and the national security state.

Doug Bandow discusses Rubio vs Trump.

Yossi Gurvitz discusses Israeli policy in the West Bank.

Jesse Franzblau discusses Hilary Clinton and the drug war in Mexico.

Thomas Nagel discusses drone warfare under Obama.

Medea Benjamin discusses Hilary Clinton and the Iraq War.

Medea Benjamin and Rebecca Green discuss arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the war in Yemen.

Kelly Vlahos discusses Bowie Bergdahl.

Lucy Steigerwald discusses killer bipartisanship.

Daniel Larison discusses the U.S. backed Saudi war on Yemen.

Neve Gordon discusses Israeli politics and liberal democracy.

Uri Avnery discusses Israeli politics.

Jon Schwartz discusses the signers of an anti-Trump letter on foreign policy.

Richard M. Ebeling discusses how big government worsens income inequality.

Richard M. Ebeling discusses an economist who stood up to Hitler.

Roderick Tracy Long discusses Ancient Greece and liberty.

Tom Engelhardt discusses the repititive character of American warmaking.

Jacob G. Hornberger discusses the Middle East killing racket.

Sheldon Richman discusses Shay’s rebellion and the Constitution.

Sheldon Richman discusses Sanders and Trump on trade.

Laurence M. Vance discusses lawas banning pumping your own gas.

Chris Floyd discusses Bernie Sanders and foreign policy.

James Bovard discusses sugar subsidies in the U.S.

Binoy Kampmark discusses torture and Donald Trump.

Kelly Vee discusses why mental illness is no laughing matter.

Daniel Larison discusses Hilary Clinton’s judgment on foreign policy.

Attack the Powerful

Some of the reactions to my recent piece on Nancy Reagan (“Nancy Reagan’s Dark Legacy” 7 Mar 2016) seem to lose the forest through the trees. After publishing the article at both C4SS and LewRockwell.com, I’ve received a few emails and comments which I believe misinterpret the intent of the article. Let me be clear, I’m not responding because I feel under attack, but rather because I’d like to double down on my assault on power.

The world today suffers from extreme deference to authority. There is a severe absence of challenges to power. That’s not to say that there aren’t lone wolves and small groups who succeed at holding the powerful accountable. But they’re few and far between. The media and others who have the platform to do so fail miserably. It’s as if they don’t view it as one of their central responsibilities. Essentially, the great majority of those tasked with attacking power do the exact opposite, and end up playing the role of P.R. for the elite.

Take Bill Maher for example. What a sad case of a comedian-turned-court jester. Maher’s good for an occasional diatribe on why pot should be legalized, or why Republicans are crazy, but leave him to his own devices and he’s soon begging for Barack Obama to come on his show, even going so far as advertising publicly how easy the interview will be. Marc Maron and Jimmy Fallon provide additional recent examples of pathetic Obama Court Jester-like interviews. This would’ve repulsed comedy’s renegade forefathers like Lenny Bruce, George Carlin and Richard Pryor.

The media is no different. Though there are notable exceptions, mostly gone are the days of counter-power journalists like Ida B. Wells, H.L. Mencken, and Garet Garrett, who slammed conventional wisdom, and had a generally adversarial relationship with the powerful. Those are the types of public figures we should be celebrating when they pass.

Most of us unwittingly play an enabling role in this unhealthy relationship with the elite. When a powerful figure like Nancy Reagan dies, our first instinct is to mourn her and celebrate her life and to blind ourselves to the conditions they created. It is the respectful and tactful thing to do, we’re told. I say take a sledgehammer to respect and tact.

Let their families and loved ones mourn them with opulent services and whitewashed retrospectives.

I wrote “Nancy Reagan’s Dark Legacy” because it needed saying amid the 24/7 hagiographic remembrances all over television and all throughout the news media. Those who lived under the Reagan regime need to hear an honest, clear-headed, biting critique of the effect Nancy Regan had on our lives. Anything less absolves Reagan of her role in the utterly horrific Drug War.

Behaving in such a sycophantic way when a member of the ruling class dies further entrenches the ruling class. Ignoring the profound harm the they cause the rest of us cultivates an atmosphere of obedience and empowers them to continue on their path of destruction. Not only will I not participate in it, I’ll attack it again and again, at every opportunity.

Kevin Carson on Robot Overlordz Podcast

On April 19, 2015, C4SS’s Kevin Carson appeared on the Robot Overlordz podcast. Carson holds the Karl Hess Chair in Social Theory at C4SS. Carson’s Desktop Regulatory State is now available for purchase at Amazon. Don’t forget to Fund the Revolution and contribute to C4SS’s bottom line when you purchase your copy.

From the Robot Overlordz descrption of the interview:

Are we living through the end of capitalism? What will replace what has been the dominant economic system of the planet for the last several hundred years? We’re joined this episode by Kevin Carson of the Center For a Stateless Society to talk about the future of economics, markets and work. What will the society of the future look like? Plus a little bonus discussion of one of the earliest Internet philosophers, Robert Anton Wilson.

The clip is about a half hour long.

Nick Ford Interviewed on Political Scams

C4SS Senior Fellow Nick Ford was recently interviewed by Hector Combo for the Political Scams podcast. A few of the topics discussed include the philosophy of individualism and the differences between anarcho-capitalism and anarcho-communism. As the conversation unfolds, Nick describes his “cynical optimism” on the current presidential election. According to Nick, the 2016 elections present a good opportunity for anarchists to educate the American public on the ideals of a voluntarist society.

The clip is 41 minutes long.

 

Kevin Carson’s Desktop Regulatory State

C4SS Senior Fellow Kevin Carson’s book The Desktop Regulatory State: The Countervailing Power of Individuals and Networks, a project of five years work, is now in print. It’s also available online here. Here’s a description C4SS Senior Fellow Gary Chartier — who’s also responsible for the beautiful interior and cover design — wrote for the back cover:

Defenders of the modern state often claim that it’s needed to protect us — from terrorists, invaders, bullies, and rapacious corporations. Economist John Kenneth Galbraith, for instance, famously argued that the state was a source of “countervailing power” that kept other social institutions in check. But what if those “countervailing” institution — corporations, government agencies and domesticated labor unions — in practice collude more than they “countervail” each other? And what if network communications technology and digital platforms now enable us to take on all those dinosaur hierarchies as equals — and more than equals. In The Desktop Regulatory State, Kevin Carson shows how the power of self-regulation, which people engaged in social cooperation have always possessed, has been amplified and intensifed by changes in consciousness — as people have become aware of their own power and of their ability to care for themselves without the state — and in technology — especially information technology. Drawing as usual on a wide array of insights from diverse disciplines, Carson paints an inspiring, challenging, and optimistic portrait of a humane future without the state, and points provocatively toward the steps we need to take in order to achieve it.

Editor’s Report, February 2016

This month’s Editor’s Report may be brief, but that’s by no means an indication that our output has slowed. In fact, our prolific writers managed to produce a commentary or feature article almost every single day this month. My personal favorite was Nathan Goodman’s Don’t Change the Players, Change the Game. For those still under the illusion that Bernie Sanders represents revolutionary reform, I recommend reading Nathan’s views on the matter.

Sheldon Richman’s commentary, Bush, 9/11 and Iraq: Trump Gets It Right, was reprinted by the Chicago Sun Times. This is a great pickup for C4SS. Although one of our goals is to counter the establishment media’s false narratives by offering an alternative platform where you can read about current events, I’ll never complain when we infiltrate a corporate media stronghold.

C4SS is excited to have published Kevin Carson’s latest study. It’s titled, Techno-Utopianism, Counterfeit and Real. Carson calls it “a survey of post-scarcity and p2p models on the Left and a response to Old Left types who see any kind of techno-utopianism (or anything at all on the Left that emphasizes decentralism and horizontality) as a Trojan horse for Newt Gingrich-style liberalism.” It’s available under the Studies section of the website, or as a downloadable PDF file.

Thanks again to all of our readers and generous financial supporters. We rely on you to keep us going. If you’re new to C4SS and enjoy our work, please consider making a donation to C4SS via Paypal, Patreon, or any of our other countless giving platforms.

Chad

How Do Market Anarchists See Property?

The issue of property is a contentious one among market anarchists, as it has been historically within the greater anarchist tradition. Ever since Proudhon’s claim that “property is theft,” anarchists have argued about the proper resolution to the question of land ownership actually is. To free market anarchists, the answer is a bit more concise. Generally market anarchists are friendly to personal land-tenure. They see individual possession of land as non-exploitative in and of itself and an absolute tenet, as even Proudhon posited, to “liberty.” Positions among free market anarchists can range: Mutualists believe in private property so long as it is based on personal occupancy and use; Cousins to the mutualists, the Georgists, envision a system of land-tenure in which people live in contractual communities whose public goods are financed from land rent; Rothbardians generally see rights to property as “human rights” that belong to all human beings.

If readers are interested in finding out more on market anarchist views of land tenure and some of the property regimes we’d recognize as legitimate in an anarchist society, you’ll find C4SS’s Mutual Exchange Symposium titled Discourse on Occupancy and Use: Potential Applications and Possible Shortcomings quite informative.

<< Back to the Market Anarchism FAQ page

The Weekly Libertarian Leftist Review 114

Richard M. Ebeling discusses how Lithuania helped take down the USSR.

Andrew Bacevich discusses U.S. foreign policy.

Dan Sanchez discusses herd think.

Lucy Steigerwald discusses diplomacy and hawks.

Sheldon Richman discusses Iran and U.S. foreign policy.

Dan Sanchez discusses the lottery and voting.

Dan Sanchez discusses the use of expendable assets in American foreign policy.

Ivan Eland discusses Obama, saber rattling, and appeasement.

Robert Parry discusses Hilary’s seeking of neocon shelter.

Lucy Steigerwald discusses the boots already on the ground in Iraq.

Branko Marcetic discusses how Sanders and Clinton both embraced a warmonger in their latest debate.

Medea Benjamin discusses Henry Kissinger.

Jacob G. Hornberger discusses U.S. interventionism in Iraq.

Laurence M. Vance discusses freedom of choice.

Jacob G. Hornberger discusses Albright and Kissinger bringing shame to Hilary Clinton.

Robert Fantina discusses the U.S. election and Palestine.

Soud Sharabani interviews Ramzy Baroud on Israel-Palestine.

Uri Avnery discusses Arab-Jewish cooperation in Israel.

Franklin Lamb discusses Iran and the U.S.

Sheldon Richman discusses ending the military draft.

Chris Ernesto discusses liberal hypocrisy and Bernie.

The Weekly Abolitionist: Prison Abolition at ISFLC

That’s right, I’m back! You can once again get your weekly dose of prison abolitionist opinion and analysis right here at the Center for a Stateless Society.

Throughout my absence, my C4SS colleagues have presented excellent prison abolitionist commentary. For example, Nick Ford argued that despite Tutwiler Prison’s formal demise, the rape-filled prison system it represents will live on until prisons are abolished. Similarly, Ryan Calhoun pointed out that President Obama’s valid arguments against solitary confinement of youth apply to the incarceration of youth more generally.

And C4SS’s prison abolitionist commentary isn’t limited to the written word.  Last fall at Students For Liberty’s Oklahoma Regional Conference, I joined social justice hacktivist Rebecca Crane and C4SS’s own Cory Massimino for a panel on prison abolition. Cory discussed the libertarian philosophical case for prison abolition, I explored how mainline political economy complements prison abolitionist analysis, and Rebecca discussed how technology is paving the way for new forms of security, justice, and governance independent of the carceral state.

Next week, C4SS will be bringing our prison abolitionist arguments and advocacy to the largest libertarian gathering in the world: the International Students For Liberty Conference (ISFLC). On Saturday at 4pm, C4SS’s Meg Arnold, Cory Massimino, and Jason Lee Byas will join prison reform activists Blake Feldman and Bryant Jackson-Green for “Reform to Revolution: Libertarian Perspectives on Criminal Justice.”

Libertarians broadly agree that something is rotten in our criminal justice system. But they disagree on what to do about it. Most support incremental reforms implemented through the political process. However, there are strong reasons, both moral and pragmatic, to prefer an abolitionist approach. As Jason Lee Byas has argued, if we take non-aggression and proportionality seriously, prisons appear to be sources of illegitimate aggressive violence, even when used against violent criminals. On a more practical level, attempts to reform the criminal justice system through legislation and litigation have had perverse unintended consequences that further entrench carceral power. These unintended consequences largely result from the public choice incentives that pervade the political process. Abolitionist tactics that involve routing around the political system may be able to avoid these unintended consequences by undermining the power of political actors rather than attempting to persuade them to act against their self-interest. As a radical position, prison abolition seems utopian. But it may be more pragmatic than many approaches to prison reform, when the incentives that plague political decision making are taken seriously.

Whether you believe reform or abolition presents the best approach to ameliorating the ills of our criminal injustice system, I hope you will join us at ISFLC. The conversation promises to be a fruitful discussion of different approaches to bringing about a more just, equitable, and free world.

Anarchy in DC!

Thanks to many generous radicals, the Center for a Stateless Society has raised enough money to sponsor the International Students For Liberty Conference this February. Students For Liberty, an international non-profit organization dedicated to empowering pro-liberty student leaders and training them to be agents of change in their communities, hosts the biggest, loudest gathering of liberty-minded individuals in the world every year in the belly of the beast. Last year over 1,700 liberty lovers trekked to the most wretched place on Earth in order to learn, educate, network, party, and organize with SFL.

C4SS joined in on the fun last year, hosting a social with over 100 guests interested in the ideas of left-wing market anarchism, and putting together an exhibitor table, distributing countless zines, pamphlets, books, and pins to students from around the globe who are favorable to the Center’s synthesis of leftist concerns about social domination and economic exploitation with libertarian concerns about state oppression and dwindling personal freedom.

This year, the Center for a Stateless Society will again be making the journey to D.C. in order to represent the left-libertarian branch of the coalition that Students For Liberty aims to bring together once every twelve months. We will have our table in the exhibitor hall with all the left-libertarian goodies you can think of, giving a voice to those libertarians who feel at home with those who care about social justice and leftists who feel at home with those who care about liberty. We are also putting on another social this year, the details of which can be found here, if having lunch with dozens of other left market anarchists you’ve met on the internet is your thing.

The Center would like to thank its supporters, whether they had the ability to donate or not, for their continuing advocacy of a leftism that cares about the individual and a libertarianism that cares about the social. We hope you can join us in Washington D.C. on February 26-28 to build a community with fellow liberty-minded folks and see the amazing personal and professiona, opportunities that the ISFLC and the countless guests and sponsor organizations have to offer.

Portuguese Media Coordinator Update, January 2016

These are our numbers for January:

We also published two translations: Kevin Carson’s “Inequality Isn’t Something That Just ‘Happens’” and “Mobility, Meritocracy and Other Myths“.

The C4SS Portuguese social media operation had been my baby since I took over the duties of Media Coordinator in 2014. In a little over a year, our Facebook presence grew tremendously, we started doing Twitter, set up shop on Tumblr and we published dozens of articles each month. Brazilian visitors have come to represent a large chunk of C4SS’s readership, behind only the United States.

Unfortunately, my taking over other duties on C4SS (notably being the English Media Coordinator) and other responsibilities led me to neglect the work I had built in Portuguese. In January I set out to remedy that by bringing in Diogo Ladeira Sales to be our new Portuguese Social Media Analyst!

Diogo is a longtime supporter of C4SS and I couldn’t be happier that we were able to bring him into the fold. His duties will involve posting to our social media accounts, engaging with our fans, and sharing translation and writing duties with myself. Also, he should be giving us a more detailed insight of what’s going on social media and how we can increase our reach.

In the next few months, we should be hearing a lot more from him.

You can support our worldwide efforts to spread the word of anarchy! You can make a donation via PayPal and several other options.

Erick Vasconcelos
Media Coordinator

* * *

Relatório da coordenação de mídias em português, janeiro de 2016

Esses são os nossos números referentes a janeiro:

Também publicamos duas traduções: os artigos de Kevin Carson “A desigualdade não é algo que simplesmente ‘acontece’” e “Mobilidade, meritocracia e outros mitos“.

O trabalho em mídias sociais no C4SS era o meu xodó desde que eu havia começado a ser coordenador de mídias em 2014. Em pouco mais de um ano, nossa presença no Facebook cresceu muito, entramos no Twitter, fizemos uma página no Tumblr e passamos a publicar dezenas de artigos por mês. Os visitantes brasileiros passaram a representar uma grande fatia dos leitores do C4SS, atrás apenas dos americanos.

Infelizmente, o fato de eu ter assumido outros trabalhos no C4SS (como ter me tornado o coordenador de mídias em inglës) e outras responsabilidades me levaram a negligenciar o nosso trabalho em português. Por isso, em janeiro eu me propus a remediar essa situação, trazendo Diogo Ladeira Salles para ser o nosso novo analista de mídias sociais em português!

Diogo é um apoiador de longa data do C4SS e eu não poderia estar mais feliz em tê-lo com a gente. Suas tarefas serão postar nas nossas redes sociais, se envolver com nossos fãs e dividir as responsabilidades de tradução e escrita comigo. Além disso, ele também poderá sugerir novas formas de aumentar o nosso alcance nas plataformas online.

Você pode apoiar os nossos esforços mundiais para divulgar as ideias anarquistas! Faça uma doação pelo PayPal ou pelas nossas várias outras opções.

Erick Vasconcelos
Coordenador de mídias

Media Coordinator Report, December 2015 and January 2016

Since I skipped last month’s report, here are our numbers and a few comments for both December and January.

December

January

Some general comments:

  • It’s worth noticing we’ve maintained a steady output. Over the last two months, we had an op-ed for almost every week day of the month!
  • Also, thankfully, we’ve been able to tackle subjects that are being picked up by several publications. A goal I had set myself when I started as Media Coordinator was to get an average of 3 pickups per article at least. I’ve been able to do it by expanding the pool of publications we send our work to. At the moment, we send our op-eds to almost 3,400 publications worldwide. And I’m still working on getting more newspapers and websites on our list (as well as trimming the fat!).
  • Augusta Free Press has been a great partner of ours, republishing a lot of our work. In January, News LI has also started doing so. Thank you for getting our word out there!
  • Sheldon Richman has been our runaway champion in pickups. In his 10 articles published in December and January, he had an average of 5.8 pickups. Congrats and thanks for all the great work, Sheldon!

This is it! As you can see, we’ve been doing a lot, but we can do even more with your help.

Please donate and help us spread the word of anarchy and freedom! You can do it via Paypal below or various other methods!

Erick Vasconcelos
Media Coordinator

Editor’s Report, January 2016

C4SS kicked off 2016 with a bang.

In January, Gary Chartier produced several op-eds, including the left-libertarian masterpiece What’s Wrong With Inequality? It reached the front page of Real Clear Markets. Kevin Carson looked at the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, ripping into vulgar libertarian calls for more water “privatization” as the remedy. Sheldon Richman exposed Hillary Clinton’s long history of warmongering, concluding: “No one is fit to exercise power, but Hillary Clinton is the least fit of all.” In Lego and the Building Blocks of Patriarchy, Roderick Long examined the complex web of factors that shape modern day gender roles in light of Lego’s attempts to market products to girls.

C4SS added yet another gem to its Left-Libertarian Classic catalog with a reprint of Voltairine de Cleyre’s The Past and Future of the Ladies’ Liberal League. Nick Ford introduced the essay.

Kevin Carson reviewed Paul Mason’s Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future.

Last but not least, we’re in the process of deciding on the next Mutual Exchange topic. We hope to have an announcement in the next couple of weeks.

Many thanks to all of our readers and generous financial supporters. We wouldn’t be able to do this without your help. Please consider making a donation to C4SS via Paypal, Patreon, or any of our other countless giving platforms.

Chad

Austro-Libertarianism and Application Thickness

I recently wrote an article, available here, on the idea of thick libertarianism. Below I outline the core of the argument.

Starting from Austro-libertarian premises, thick libertarianism is unavoidable. Austro-libertarians are committed to the non-aggression principle (NAP) and in order to identify acts of aggression in the real world, in some cases, have to make judgements which necessarily call upon moral and political considerations outside of the NAP itself. It seems that some of these considerations are going to be more in keeping with the reasons a libertarian has for endorsing the NAP than others. In Charles Johnson’s taxonomy, this is application thickness: The idea that there are moral and political reasons for interpreting certain acts as aggression rather than others that are more coherent with thin libertarian commitments.

From an Austro-libertarian perspective, aggression is a praxeological type. That is to say it’s a category of action that has certain logical structure that can be grasped a priori. We do not need to observe aggressive acts a certain number of times, and see that they all constitute the non-consensual crossing of a property boundary in order to induce that non-consensual boundary crossings all seem to be aggressive. Rather, non-consensual boundary crossings are necessarily aggressive. Therefore, without any empirical observation, we know that if a non-consensual boundary crossing occurred, the NAP was violated. There was a victim of this aggression, and there was a perpetrator, and some sort of redress is due. Praxeological reasoning can therefore be done from the armchair. If x was a non-consensual boundary crossing, x violated the NAP. Identifying x as a boundary-crossing however cannot be done from the armchair. One must look at the actual incident in question, and interpret it as such. Physical movements of human bodies in the world do not come ready-tagged as whatever praxeolgical types they are; they must be interpreted as such by real persons.

Two praxeological types which are centrally important for the sake of identifying NAP violations in the world are consent and the initiation of aggression. When consent is given to a boundary crossing, the NAP is not violated, and if A initiated aggression against B before B used force against A, then B’s boundary crossing against A is justifiable as self-defense. Therefore, when and where we identify human behaviour as constituting these praxeological types has profound moral and political implications.

In the paper, I discuss two cases. The first is a boss who takes his secretary to have consented to having sex with him whenever he wants by her signing of her employment contract. The second is a white man who takes a black man’s behaviour to be a threat, and shoots him in purported self-defense. These cases illustrate that the interpretation one takes of the action of others means one can believe oneself to be respecting the NAP, but under a different interpretation of those actions, one violated it.

The two different interpretations, moreover, might be perfectly reasonable given the agent in question’s background. Which interpretation we take as the one that bears legal consequence has enormous moral and political implications, and as such is subject to moral and political evaluation. One ought, therefore, have the best moral and political reasons for taking whatever interpretation one does. These reasons might be consistent with the reasons one has for endorsing the NAP, or they may be inconsistent. Either way, thick libertarianism is possible if we can find the reasons to guide how we interpret other people’s actions which best fit with our reasons for being libertarians. Application thickness is thus unavoidable for an Austro-libertarian.

Send Libertarians to Prison!

The C4SS prison abolition panel, originally scheduled for last year’s APEE but sadly cancelled, is being revived for this year. The panelists will be Dan D’Amico, Gary Chartier, Jason Byas, Nathan Goodman, and myself. Jason and Nathan need some financial assistance getting to the conference; if you’d like to help, please check out our GoFundMe page.

The Weekly Libertarian Leftist Review 113

Glenn Greenwald discusses the debate over what causes anti-American terrorism.

Sheldon Richman discusses the Oregon standoff.

Justin Raimondo discusses why we need a return to normalcy.

Ben Norton discusses a Saudi war crime in Yemen.

Jacob G. Hornberger discusses the U.S. as the world’s top arms dealer.

Matthew Harwood reviews a book on privacy and data.

Richard M. Ebeling discusses why society can’t be planned.

Jacob G. Hornberger discusses the recapture of El Chapo and the War on Drugs.

Rick Shenkman discusses empathy and the victims of war.

Matt Peppe discusses the foreign policy legacy of Jimmey Carter.

Ivan Eland discusses how U.S. foreign policy helps spawn terrorists.

Jacob G. Hornberger discusses Cold War fearmongering on Korea and Cuba.

David S. D’Amato discusses Italian fascism.

Uri Avnery discusses assimilation and Israel.

Glenn Greenwald discusses the recent incident with Iran.

David Vine discusses U.S. basing efforts.

James Bovard discusses the victims of the state under Obama.

Jonathan Cook discusses Israel and apartheid.

Kathy Kelly discusses Afghanistan.

C4SS Now Available Directly as a Tor Onion Service

The Center for a Stateless Society is pleased to announce that we now support access to this site directly through the Tor network as an Onion Service. Practically, this means that if you visit the address vhgli4v7feaaz7ka.onion through the Tor Browser you will see the content of c4ss.org, but without your request to our server ever leaving the onion encryption of the Tor network.

When you browse normal websites via the Tor Browser your request is encrypted under several layers and then shuffled around in the Tor network with each forwarding node decrypting the instructions for the next node to forward it to. This provides some relatively strong anonymity guarantees against any observer or node in the network being able to tell both your location and the ultimate destination of your traffic (the website you’re accessing). But ultimately when browsing normal websites your request leaves the Tor network at an exit node and travels through the regular internet to the website’s server.

In contrast Onion Services directly establish a connection into the Tor network, allowing visitors to make connections to such servers without ever making requests on the normal (and relatively transparent) web. In many cases this is useful in that it provides some anonymity guarantees not just for the visitor, but also for the website itself! The Silk Road and its many descendants utilized this function to only serve their website over an Onion Service, and thus hide the location and other critical information about the server itself.

Our servers are not hidden, c4ss.org is happily and openly hosted in Reykjavík, Iceland by 1984 Hosting, a provider committed to resisting state power and that runs on geothermal and hydroelectric energy. So why provide an Onion Service in addition to our normal domain? Several reasons:

1.) We like Tor. We’ve consistently maintained a Tor node since very early on when the network was small, we count many Tor developers as personal friends & comrades, and we host guides to Tor & other security tools. By serving our site as an Onion Service we join a fledgling but growing number of other normal websites (including even Facebook thanks to one heroic engineer) who are in effect standing in solidarity with Tor and the precious anonymity it provides. Tor is not a silver bullet, but it provides a significant increase in anonymity and security. We know from the Snowden documents and other sources that while state agencies are sometimes able to successfully exploit a few users (due to things like using outdated versions of the Tor Browser), they are actually quite maddened by their inability to decloak all users, or even most specific users. Today millions of people use Tor and countless lives have been saved as a result. It is not an understatement to say that many anarchist projects and entire resistance movements would be direly crippled without Tor.

2.) Security for our users. Accessing our site through vhgli4v7feaaz7ka.onion provides automatic self-authentication. You don’t have to trust some intermediary Certificate Authority to tell you that you’re really reaching us directly and that no one is intercepting your connection, pretending to be us. Because the address itself is a hash of the unique secret key that identifies us, you can save it and be assured from then on whenever accessing our site through that address that you’re getting the real thing, with end-to-end encryption. Additionally the Tor Browser provides a number of other security benefits to users out of box and we hope to encourage more people to use it daily.

3.) Redundancy. The internet has been one of the greatest advances towards liberty in human history, in part because it developed so fast and so inauspiciously that the governments and private powers of the world were unable to quickly react. As the ramifications became clear, of course, they have responded with massive many-pronged attacks. Many countries have effected aggressive censorship regimes and major politicians in the global north are now openly calling for the outlawing of encryption and even the internet wholesale. We regularly face attacks and years ago were famously shut down by a DMCA served by neonazis. It is quite plausible that western governments will attempt broader censorship regimes targeting political dissidents and anarchists are always among the first. Today’s internet architecture has been warped in a drastically hierarchical direction that is hugely liable to state coercion. The Domain Name System and Certificate Authority infrastructures are horribly broken by design and it is probably only a matter of time before they are directly used as hands of the state. Providing an Onion Service enables us to continue serving content securely even in a relatively catastrophic situation where our domain and/or certificate are revoked or openly man-in-the-middle’d by state powers. Even if they take our server in Reykjavík we can simply move to a different server at a hidden location and continue to stay online at the same address.

Of course our canonical Onion Service address may change address in the future (the Tor Project is looking to extend the address size), but you can check back here for any updates.

We heartily encourage other anarchists, radicals and activists to do the same. Setting up an Onion Service on an already running server is painless. The Tor Project hosts good documentation and Riseup.net provides an excellent guide to best practices.

For a while the United States’ labyrinthine internal power structures worked at odds with one another — the State Department giving some grant money that ended up with the Tor Project while the Pentagon dedicated far more resources to fight it — since Snowden the US is finally getting its act together in recognizing that anonymity and a free internet ultimately poses an existential threat to state power. The Tor Project is thus desperately looking for new sources of funding. You can donate here, but even better than pouring funds into a single financial pool that is vulnerable to state sanction or attack is helping further decentralize the function of the Tor Project. If you have programming, translating, artistic, or organizing skills there are many ways to help directly by joining a legion of volunteers and contributors, formally or informally.

Make no mistake, the internet is not invulnerable; it is presently under siege on every front. They will escalate in their attacks upon its basic infrastructure, and we — as anarchists committed to a freer world — have an obligation to support resistance, to empower our readers, and to be ready for future developments.

December 2015 C4SS Audio/Visual Coordinator Report

Article Uploads

In December, I uploaded the following four readings from myself and John Moore to the YouTube and the Jellycast feeds:

Aylan’s Shoes by Grant Mincy

Cut Out the State, Free Entrepreneurship by Nick Ford

Limiting Conditions and Local Desires by Shawn P. Wilbur

Are We All Mutualists? by Kevin Carson

Currently, I am prioritizing the recording of Mutual Exchange articles. I am still churning through the November/December Mutual Exchange symposium: Property: Occupancy and Use.  I hope to have the most read ones recorded within the next couple of months.

Other Projects

The intern interviews are still pending. However, with the holiday season finally being over, I anticipate scheduling will be much easier.

Nick has been diligently uploading Christopher King’s excellent reading of Gary Chartier’s Conscience of an Anarchist. Here is the most recent upload.

I am still planning to begin a weekly or monthly news commentary podcast within the next few months. The exact timing of this project will depend on how many volunteers are available to help with it.

Social Media Figures

Facebook: net +7 Likes

YouTube: 2305 views in December 2962 views in November, 82,790 total

+21 net subscriptions in December, +10 net subscriptions in November, 1229 total Subscribers

Earnings Estimates: $5.62 in December, $4.36 in November, $36.02 Lifetime Earnings

Please Volunteer

A meaningful audio-visual media presence takes a lot of effort. In November, I spent 20 hours doing everything from writing this monthly report to editing other readers’ audio to planning future interviews. This amount of time likely needs to double in order to ensure consistent improvements in the quality of our output and growth of our subscriber base.  Bottom line, Feed44 needs readers, editors, and content creators!

Do you have a recording setup that you’ve been letting go to waste by not recording C4SS articles? Drop us a line and we can help you fix that.

Are you bursting with ideas for visual accompaniment to all your favorite C4SS articles? Message me and we can help you bring those ideas to life.

Do you want to rant about market anarchist philosophy and the abolition of the state, discuss great works of left-libertarian authors with like minded individuals, and interview the leading lights of the left-libertarian movement? Let us know.

The C4SS Q1 Tor Node Fundraiser

Essentially, the tragedy of past revolutions has been that, sooner or later, their doors closed, “at ten in the evening.” The most critical function of modern technology must be to keep the doors of the revolution open forever! –Murray Bookchin

Part of the dissolutionary strategy advocated by C4SS is called Open Source Insurgency or embracing institutional, organizational or technological innovations — low-tech or high-tech — that render centralized or authoritarian governance impossible (or so damn costly as to be regarded impossible). One of these innovations is Tor. And, so, C4SS maintains an always-on Tor Node. But we need your help.

C4SS has maintained a Tor relay node for going-on 5 years. This is our first quarter fundraiser for this project. Every contribution will help us maintain the node until April 2016.

We encourage everyone to consider operating a Tor relay node yourself. If this, for whatever reason, is not an option, you can still support the Tor project and online anonymity with a $5 donation to the C4SS Tor relay node.

C4SS maintains a Tor relay node with a freedom friendly data center in the Netherlands. The relay is part of a global network dedicated to the idea that a free society requires freedom of information. Since June 2011 C4SS has continuously added nearly 10 Mbps of bandwidth to the network (statistics). Although we can’t know, by design, what passes through the relay, it’s entirely likely that it has facilitated communications by revolutionaries, agorists, whistleblowers, journalists working under censorious regimes and many more striving to advance the cause of liberty and the dissolution of authority.

If you believe, as we do, that Tor is one of the technologies that makes both state and corporate oppression not only obsolete, but impossible, please consider operating as a Tor relay or donating to support the C4SS node.

The State is damage, we will find a route around!

If you are interested in learning more about Tor and how to become a relay node yourself, then check out our write up on the project: Stateless Tor.

Please donate today!

Bitcoin is also welcome:

  • 1N1pF6fLKAGg4nH7XuqYQbKYXNxCnHBWLB
Anarchy and Democracy
Fighting Fascism
Markets Not Capitalism
The Anatomy of Escape
Organization Theory