In an interview with Denise Maerker of Televisa, during her February trip to Mexico, Hillary Clinton explained why drugs can’t be legalized: “I don’t think that will work. I mean, I hear the same debate. … It is not likely to work. There is just too much money in it, and I don’t think that — you can legalize small amounts for possession, but those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped.”
At first glance, you might think this is just economic illiteracy. After all, it’s plain common sense that the reason there’s “so much money” in drugs is BECAUSE they’re illegal. They fetch a black market price. If pot was legal and sold for the same per ounce as oregano, you think there’d be Mexican gangs fighting to control the border trafficking in it? The best way to “stop” the people “who are making so much money selling” is to make the stuff cheap and legally available.
It stands to reason that the biggest foes of legalization — even more than the drug cops — are the folks in organized crime who make money off the drug trade. I vaguely recall an anecdote about a “dry county” election somewhere in the deep south; the local bootlegger’s car was plastered with bumper stickers reading “For the sake of my family, keep X County dry.”
But on closer examination, I suspect Clinton’s remark was a Freudian slip. She wasn’t guilty so much of exposing her ignorance as of inadvertently giving the uninitiated a brief glimpse of the truth — that the government won’t legalize drugs because there’s too much money — for them and their allies — in keeping them illegal.
It’s basic economics that creating a black market in any criminalized substance will, in turn, create organized crime networks that profit from trafficking in controlled substances. Prohibition resulted in the explosive growth of organized crime in America.
But what some people don’t realize is that one of the organized crime gangs that profits from controlling the drug trade has blue for its gang colors. On the crudest level, you’ve got cops on the take who allow some drug traffickers to operate — just so long as they pay protection money. Or cops who seize the stuff and then sell it. But it would be a mistake to treat this as just a “bad apples” problem. Police culture is corrupted to its very heart by the Drug War.
Drug criminalization doesn’t just enable the profits of syndicates in Colombia or Mexico. It props up a sordid empire of militarized SWAT teams that terrorize families and murder innocent people in their homes, of civil forfeiture larceny enabled by jailhouse snitches, and of “Interjurisdictional Drug Task Forces” overflowing with cash. The entire police culture associated with the Drug War — just as much as what we conventionally think of as organized crime — looks like something beneath an overturned rock.
The Drug War, in short, is where all the money is. You can’t legalize drugs because there’s too much money in keeping them illegal — for the cops.
On a larger scale, the biggest narcotraffickers in the world are the U.S. National Security State and its clients. Afghanistan is a case in point. One reason the Taliban were so unpopular was that they stamped out opium production. The only place in Afghanistan where the poppies were being cultivated on a large scale was in the Northern Alliance territories. So the U.S. overthrows the Taliban, the CIA handlers on the ground set up the Northern Alliance as the new national government — and Afghanistan is once again the center of world heroin production.
Drugs can’t be legalized because there’s too much money in it — for the international spooks. That includes the big banks that launder all the drug money and buy politicians all over the world (including in the U.S.). It includes the CIA, which has historically used the drug trade to fund death squads and coups all over the world.
There’s too much money — for the state and its allies — in keeping drugs illegal. Kind of makes you wonder whose side the state’s really on.
Translations for this article:
- Portuguese, Hillary Clinton Deixa o Gato Escapar do Saco.
Citations to this article:
- Kevin Carson, Hillary Clinton Lets the Cat Out of the Bag, Sonoran News, 05/11/11




Bravo.
Unfortunately, we know which side their on, their own…and you're not on it.
My recent post Obama’s Libyan Waterloo- The Perfect Storm of Incompetence
The leader of the State drug gang: George H.W. Bush.
(Why do you think they call him "Poppy"?)
Wouldn't it be great if someone had some direct evidence — CIA, FBI, Foreign Service, NSA, any other letter sets — tying funding of federal activities with drug money — that could be leaked to the public. It would be nice to reduce the level of crime, reduce the prison population and place some limits on government power (by forcing it to get money more transparently).
As Clark Ashton Smith put it, "All laws are good, to those who draw a salary for their enforcement."
My recent post Egypt Military Govt Bans Protests- Strikes
I agree completely, Kevin. On the bootlegger anecdote, it refers to a phenomenon of "Baptists and Bootleggers" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptists_and_bootleggers) in which seemingly opposing parties (prohibitionists and the contraband smugglers) both have a vested interest in the status quo. That link shows the fear of contraband growers at last year's California ballot initiative to legalize cannabis for medicinal uses.
As to Afghanistan, I have heard that opium is harvested in November. Coincidentally, we invaded in October 2001…in time for the crop to be distributed. Hamid Karzai's brother is also reputed to be the country's largest opium dealer. Whether either of these are true I can't say for sure, but they would not be surprising, given US history. Then of course there were the Opium Wars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars) the first "drug wars," fought to open China to opium by the British Empire. How ironic.
Google "Israeli art students" and you'll get a glimpse into the turf war for drugs going on between DEA and the Mossad. Most of the Ecstasy sold in the US comes from Israel.
Well if the people were enlightened so not to want or need any drugs the problem would not exist. Maybe some effort should be directed in accomplishing that task.
The state of mind of humanity has not reached the level it should have. Could be the obsession with things and search for oneself. A self fulfilling prophecy of dysfunction that need not be…need another hundred years maybe?
Who is playing with your mind?
Well that is why money speaks for itself. Too much selfishness will lead them to downfall.
My recent post אתר מותאם לסלולר