Disturbing news from Occupy circles about NYPD practices these days — I mean, in addition to all those other NYPD practices we were already disturbed about.
David Graeber, a prominent anarchist involved with Occupy since its beginning, recounts seeing a woman friend in New York a few weeks ago, her hand in a cast. A cop had grabbed her breast, she said.
When she raised a fuss and screamed about the groping, the cops dragged her out of sight and started working her over. “Stop resisting!” they continued to shout, as they repeatedly slammed her body into the concrete. At some point she told them she was reaching over to get her glasses, which had come off in the scuffle. In the reptilian police mind, this justified pinning her hands behind her back and bending one wrist until it snapped.
Those familiar with police riots versus anti-globalization demonstrations and the more recent Occupy demonstrations, or who follow Radley Balko and CopBlock, are aware that sexual assault’s the only thing unusual about this case. As Graeber says, “arbitrary violence is nothing new. The apparently systematic use of sexual assault against women protestors is new.”
Of course sexual assault itself is hardly new as a weapon of social control, in historical terms. It appears in the arsenals of most authoritarian regimes — large-scale, premeditated use of rape for ethnic cleansing by Serbian forces in Bosnia, Egyptian troops using “virginity inspections” to humiliate female demonstrators taken into custody, and so on.
But it’s new in the recent American context. Graeber notes he heard no complaints of sexual assault by the NYPD before March 17; but there were several on that day (one woman reported being grabbed by five different officers), and they’ve continued since then. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that this is a newly adopted “unofficial policy” of the police rank-and-file — just like covering badge numbers.
What we’re witnessing is the reality behind that Officer Friendly mask. This is what happens when the state perceives the general population as a threat, and drops the pretense that The Policeman is Your Friend.
People in predominantly black and Hispanic inner city neighborhoods — where police hardly bother to hide the fact that they see the local population as an occupied enemy that must be cowed by superior force — have seen this ugly face for decades. But in recent months, the radical upsurge in police violence at Occupy demonstrations, combined with ubiquitous cell phone video, have introduced the naked face of power to many in the white middle class public for the first time.
Lt. Pike of the UC Davis police force, methodically directing pepper spray into the upturned faces of peaceful (and predominantly white) college students, was a revelation to many in the burbs. But while it was the first sight for many, it won’t be the last. Because this is what the state looks like when it can no longer afford to maintain the facade of democracy. All that nasty stuff that used to happen to “those other people” beyond that Thin Blue Line — “It’s Giuliani time!” — is coming soon to “people like us.”
The American state has operated in a manner, if not lawful at least “regular,” toward most white middle-class folks most of the time, because it could afford to. It showed its nasty side to racial minorities and radicals, because they were less successfully socialized into consensus reality — and nobody “who counted” would listen to them anyway. But most of the public absorbed its conditioning in a more-or-less satisfactory manner. They believed this was a “free enterprise society” in which people with great wealth mostly earned it, giant corporations got that way through superior performance, the state represented all of us rather than some “ruling class,” and if you didn’t like the law you should work for change within the system — all that Pleasantville stuff. Constitutionalism and legality’s comparatively no-muss no-fuss — but only so long as the cultural reproduction apparatus successfully manufactures consent.
Now the conditioning’s starting to wear off. A dangerously increasing number of people understand that the system’s rigged in the interest of the 1%, and folks like us are playing in a crooked game. The state and the corporate ruling class that controls it have been stunned as measures that ten years ago would have gone through without a hitch, like SOPA and ACTA, suffered unexpected losses to networked movements. The system can’t work when too many people notice the man behind the curtain.
The state’s functionaries are beginning to realize how high the stakes really are. In response, its shock troops are dropping the Officer Friendly masks. So get ready: The state, before it’s over, will be as nasty as it has to be.
Translations for this article:
- Portuguese, O Policial Será Seu Amigo — Enquanto Der.
Citations to this article:
- Kevin Carson, Nasty as They Want to Be: The Crackdown on Occupy, Counterpunch, 05/08/12
- Kevin Carson, Occupy Protesters: Police inflict sexual assault and other abuses, The Canadian, 05/07/12




Here's David Graeber's article:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo/message/15271…
They're gonna kill that poor woman.
And the people will become as nasty as they need be. I don't tolerate bad cops.
We know who the real terrorists are…
I'd love to see resistance happen, but frankly, I don't see the "masses" revolting any time soon. Remember the "good Germans"? The general population of the USA is so conditioned to see the government as their "representatives", that it is highly unlikely that the idea of a revolt will ever occur to them until it is far too late. If it ever occurs at all. By that time, the combination of the spy network and the FEMA camps will be in place to crush any hint of revolt. No, it's best to just ride the storm out. A socialist government will collapse based on its own inner contradictions and with no one to bail out the USA, that collapse will come sooner rather than later. It would be better to prepare to pick up the pieces after a collapse than to prepare for resisting the powers that be.
Kevin wrote, "large-scale, premeditated use of rape for ethnic cleansing by
Serbian forces in Bosnia…"
Check out anitwar.com and get up to speed on the fact that the Clinton
White House lied about this and other supposed Serb atrocities to justify
U.S. and NATO bombing campaigns. I'm not saying that there wasn't rape,
because there was, committed by both sides, but no evidence of any systemic
or as Kevin put it, "large-scale, premeditated use".
Example: "Eventually, however, the myths were exposed. The total death
toll of the war was just under 100,000, and included many Serbs and Croats.
The war in Sarajevo, however brutal, was exaggerated and manipulated for
propaganda purposes. There was no evidence of mass rape, let alone its
alleged systematic nature. The "death camps" were a hoax." – http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2010/07/09/sreb…