Well, here it is, folks: The Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the “individual mandate” provision in the Affordable Care Act, aka “ObamaCare.” As of 2014, all Americans will pay a portion of their taxes to an insurance company of their choice instead of to Uncle Sam (or Uncle will come calling).
Canned consternation from the usual critics on the right, of course — you know, the people who brought you HMOs, Medicare Part D, and RomneyCare, all in the name of “free enterprise.” Forcing you to buy “insurance,” whether for yourself or someone else, is only bad when Democrats or New York’s “Five Families” do it.
In reality, the right should be celebrating CannibalCare … er, ObamaCare. Not only did Republicans lay three decades of its groundwork, not only was the template for the law laid down by none other than GOP presidential Mitt Romney, not only was the deciding SCOTUS vote cast by a George W. Bush appointee, Chief Justice John Roberts, but it’s the ultimate triumph of “privatization.”
Huh? What? Yes, “privatization.”
The federal government’s primary function — like that of all political governments — has always been to extract as much of the wealth you create as possible from your pocket and deposit it in the bank accounts of the politically connected and the privileged wealthy.
Usually this process of extraction and redistribution is accomplished through complex sleights of hand, with lots of talk about “public goods” and “legitimate government functions” intervening between the taking of the money and the handing over of it to “defense” contractors, private prison corporations, companies with friends in the highway construction and repair bureaucracy, and so forth.
Health care “reform” is the current pinnacle of the “privatization” process. They’ve cut out the middleman! Instead of all the smoke and mirrors, you’ll now just pay part of your taxes directly to Kaiser Permanente or Blue Cross Blue Shield. And just as if you had paid those taxes to the government, you’ll get something in return for them … whether you want it or not.
Most people I’ve talked with about CannibalCare … er, ObamaCare … realize that there’s something deeply immoral in the whole concept. But at the same time they despair over ever-increasing health care costs, without ever noticing that those cost increases have been the result of more than a century of successive political interventions, not of anything resembling actual market processes. And more, they don’t realize that those interventions have been created and defended by the “right” as often as by the “left.”
Republican president George W. Bush proposed and signed Medicare Part D. Republican President Ronald Reagan signed the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act. Republican president Richard Nixon proposed and signed the Health Maintenance Organizations Act. Scratch a Republican congresscritter and he’ll squeal that he wants to “save” Medicare and “decentralize” Medicaid with “block grants” of your money. Ask him if he’s interested in repealing the laws that give a medieval style guild (the American Medical Association) a monopoly on the provision of medical care, and security will escort you from the premises.
So if you think voting Republican (or any other way) this November is going to get CannibalCare … er, ObamaCare … repealed, think again. Even if the next set of politicians puts on some kind of magic show to convince you otherwise, Democrats and Republicans alike will continue finding ways to move money from your pockets to their friends’ bank accounts. Because that’s what government does. If you want affordable health care, the first step toward it is to abolish the state.
Translations for this article:
Citations to this article:
- Thomas L. Knapp, Render Unto Caesar … er, Kaiser Permanente, Deming, New Mexico Headlight, 07/02/12




It's funny, the bottom 5 floors of the building I live, at 23rd and M Streets NW in DC, are being gutted to house a new Kaiser Permanente — which will service government fat crats in DC
Marja, maybe that reference was a little too "inside baseball." It refers to a column I wrote back in 2009 when the bill was still being considered.
I somehow accidentally deleted Marja's comment (it was asking about the term "cannibal care"). Sorry about that — it was unintentional.
Great article even if I don't always agree with your point of view. ObamaCare will be repealed next year in Congress and probably replaced by some variation of RomneyCare. Many conservatives are thinking that John Roberts is becoming David Souter number two.
Good show. The more blatantly statist rulers impose upon their victims, the more victims there will be who see the light and become anarchists. KIM: if you don't pay taxes, don't accept government-looted benefits, and haven't fallen for THE MOST DANGEROUS SUPERSTITION (see Larken Rose's book by that title), what SCOTUS, Obama, and congress say or do are just winds from blowhards.
Good article!
I’ve read a number of fairly good articles on the subject the last couple of days (mostly links from RRND), but the one thing that really amazed me (and NOT in a good way) was the press release the national LP sent out Thursday. The way I read it it was basically telling people that they better vote for Obama because Romney would be so much worse.
“Um…”, I thought. “What about voting libertarian?”
Am I wrong? Tom, did you (or anyone reading this) see the release? Am I right that it was so worded as to convince people that they shouldn’t “waste their vote” on the LP because making sure Romney didn’t win was more important?
(I thought they redeemed themselves somewhat with Friday’s press release, but still.)
Neal,
Yeah, that press release was pretty bad, from the viewpoint of a political party promoting itself.