To Occupy Wall Street:
Wall Street couldn’t have done it alone. It takes a government and/or its central bank, the Federal Reserve System, to:
- Create barriers to entry for the purpose of sheltering existing banks from competition and radical innovation, then “regulate” for the benefit of the privileged industry;
- Issue artificially cheap, economy-distorting credit in order to, among other things, give banks incentives to make shaky but profitable mortgage loans (and also to grease the war machine through deficit spending);
- Make it lucrative for banks – and their bonus-collecting executives — to bundle thousands of shaky mortgages into securities and other derivatives with the knowledge that government-sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and other companies, all subject to powerful congressmen looking for campaign contributions, will buy them after a government-licensed rating cartel scores them AAA;
- Inflate an unsustainable housing bubble by the foregoing and other methods, enticing people to foolishly overinvest in real estate.
- Work closely with lending companies to establish a variety of programs designed to lure people with few resources or bad credit into buying houses they can’t afford;
- Attract workers to the home-construction bubble, setting them up for long-term unemployment when the bubble inevitably burst;
- Implicitly guarantee big financial companies and/or their creditors that if they get into trouble they will be rescued;
- Compel the taxpayers to bail out those companies and/or creditors when the roof finally falls in.
No bank or group of banks could do these things on its own in a freed market. It takes a government-Wall Street partnership – the corporate state — to create such misery and exploitation.
So demonstrators, you are right. Something is dreadfully wrong. But your list of culprits is far from complete. So go ahead and protest outside Goldman Sachs and Bank of America. But also spend some time outside the White House, the Fed, the Treasury, and the Capitol Building. Together they are responsible for our current economic woes. These are the entities that control our fate and over which we have no real say. It’s time for things to change.
Greed without political power is boorish. Greed with political power is dangerous.
The freed market is the alternative to what you properly despise.
Citations to this article:
- Sheldon Richman, Wall Street Couldn’t Have Done it Alone, Counterpunch, 10/14/11
- Sheldon Richman, Wall Street Couldn’t Have Done it Alone, Carroll County, Maryland Standard, 10/11/11
- Sheldon Richman, Wall Street Couldn’t Have Done it Alone, Deming, New Mexico Headlight, 10/11/11
- Sheldon Richman, Wall Street Couldn’t Have Done it Alone, Media With Conscience News, 10/10/11




Excellent post, concise, to the point. Of course, tho, the state alone is necessary *and* sufficient for plenty of badness (in fact, usually much worse where government power is not checked by multinational corporate arbitrage or popular bourgeois values) and if it hadn't been Goldman Sachs it would've been some other firm instead… Goldman Sachs may well be a particularly extreme exemplar of business-state collusion, but Goldman Sachs is still not "the problem" as such. So, in a way, the leftist factions among these protesters seem to have a list of culprits that may be more "wrong" than "incomplete." Nevertheless, good post.
Cal, how is multinational corporate arbitrage a check on government power?
1. International tax competition, most obvious and empirically supported way (e.g. http://ser.oxfordjournals.org/content/9/2/339.sho….
2. FDI tends to follow stability, predictability, well-defined property rights, less onerous regulations, relatively freer market and freer trade in general; and importantly it disincentivizes ideological state officials pursuing extremist interventionist policies e.g. communism, socialism. You're not very likely going to get another Great Leap Forward in China anytime soon because you don't have ideologues in charge anymore–you have corporatists looking to privatize state assets for their own benefit, which is imperfect but much much better.
3. Gradual ideological delegitimation of the nation-state, more theoretical but still convincing – see Martin van Creveld's book on The End of the State for a good intro to that. The new book Deviant Globalization by Nils Gilman has some good stuff too.
We were originally going to stay here for only one week – and yet here we are, 3 weeks later.