There is a new thing that authorities are telling parents to be afraid of: kids listening to meditation music on the internet to “get high.”
Blogger Charles “Rad Geek” Johnson describes the scare in his July 15 entry i-Give Up. Despite the fact that so-called “digital drugs” do not involve actual ingestion of chemicals and have not been shown to have any harmful effects, “i-dosing” is presented as an unquestionably harmful practice. Visiting digital drugs websites is also supposed to make people more likely to start using illegal drugs – with the implication that minors should be sealed off from the world where they might learn of sin.
Some people do use actual drugs in ways that harm themselves. After all, anything can be done to excess, especially by people attempting to address or avoid underlying problems. But other people who use drugs do fine in life, maybe even better than they would have done without ever having used drugs.
High-risk behavior can be healthy in moderation. It provides new perspectives on life which can lead to greater understanding and better overall flourishing of personhood.
But such facts do not sway those who manufacture teen scares. The problem to them is unsupervised fun and the independence it involves.
Leisure, like most areas of life, is expected to be regimented and guided by experts. Leagues, troops, and college-application-friendly “extracurricular activities” take the place of adventure, self-improvement, and spontaneous social development. While some uses of formal organizations may be absolutely beneficial to the individual’s development, the obsessive drive to create designated times and official sanction for everything displaces the individual’s capacity to find meaning in life. As a substitute they are given professional sermons, commercial self-help products, mission statements, professionally-engineered culture, and government-approved drugs to make it easier to digest.
Finding one’s own adventure and meaning cultivates personal initiative, but waiting for others to hand life to you leaves you more vulnerable to dishonest marketing – like the marketing the military does on captive students.
To teen scare manufacturers, any group of young people congregating without official guidance is a threat. They will not consider the possibility that people might be working out their problems and meeting their needs without some exerting authority over others. Whenever a break in the system’s control becomes evident, the break will be used as a justification to clamp down with greater control. Possessions will be confiscated and free time and technology will be further restricted.
Authorities want parents to fear technology for the independence it can foster. They will not honestly evaluate the premises of what growing up is supposed to mean. Instead, any challenge to the official way of growing up – any new way of doing things, whether new music or new technology – is viewed with suspicion or hostility.


Well said Darrin, they're just trying to destroy the individuality of life and the culture of spontaneity that could arise if people were allowed to associate freely instead of being regimented under tight social control at every step of our lives.
*Darian
Not to mention that they drug the living shit out of kids with psychopharmacological weapons like Ritalin.
It could be that stuff like i-dosing, K2, and all the other substitutes for illegal drugs really are dangerous. I suppose the drug warriors would never see that as an unintended consequence of stamping out stuff like pot and MDMA. It's quite conceivable that banning illegal drugs leads to people using substitutes that nobody knows much about, and that turn out to be more harmful. That's what happened when the legal alcohol producers were driven underground during Prohibition.
For anyone who reads this article and wonders whether this i-dosing stuff really works, there is a torrent with 70 i-dosing audio files in lossless format (FLAC) available here: http://www.h33t.com/details.php?id=8416215cf01f2e…
Just sayin'…
Nick, the drive to dominate and control the lives of others is very strong in a lot of areas. Ironically, participating in mechanisms of control means you have less control of your own life even as you struggle for control over others. The rules and the roles take the lead.
Kevin, good points. According to G4 though, the technology behind digital drugs has been around since 1839, so I imagine that scientists would have discovered any potential harm by now. http://g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/706280/Local-Ne…
Adrian, thanks for providing further research materials.
That's exactly why Darian voting should be on the bottom of the list as priorities or trying to "infiltrate" the system from within, the roles and power take a hold of them before they can "take a hold on it."
I listened to "Gates of Hades" upons reading a lot of these reports and it scared the shit out of me in that ambiguously disturbing, yet thrilling kind of way.
Frankly, it was little different than the feeling I had after the last scene of "Paranormal Activity", where neither my auditory nor visual senses were isolated.