The “Internet Kill Switch” Works Both Ways

Posted by on Jul 20, 2010 in Commentary10 comments

In a recent column (“Homeland Security Mission Creep:  ‘Intellectual Property Crime’“),  I wrote that file-sharing had apparently become the latest “terrorist threat” targeted by the national  security state.  Against this background, the immediatelty following shutdown of 73,000 blogs using the blogetery WordPress platform hosted by Burstnet is especially alarming.  Burstnet announced that, in compliance with an urgent and extraordinary request by “law enforcement officials,” it was shutting down blogetery.   Their motivation is suggested by the tens of thousands of hits if you Google the blogetery site for “rapidshare” and “megaupload.”

Maybe this is what Holy Handwringing Joe Lieberman meant by an Internet “kill switch” to protect against “terrorism.”

This is just the latest example of a growing phenomenon:  businesses treating their own customers as criminal suspects, while serving “the Authorities” as their primary actual clientele.  That’s why your bank informs the Feds of large money transactions, Home Depot reports purchases of chemicals used in meth labs, and the drug store keeps track of the amount of Sudafed you buy.

The first question that comes to mind is:  Who pays Burstnet’s bills — “the Authorities” or the customers?

A friend at work recently had a relevant experience with her broadband ISP, Cox Communications.  Apparently her grandkids had downloaded a movie from some torrent site and Disney had leaned on Cox (with Cox presumably rolling over and giving them customer records without due process).  The lady at the cable office called her up and began warning her “You need to monitor your grandkids more closely,” and assorted other things she “needed to do.”  Normally I’d expect that kind of condescending lecture from someone who was paying ME money, not the other way around.

If you haven’t had your daily dose of irony, Secretary of State Clinton recently warned other countries against the dangers of imposing burdens on civil society:  “progress in the 21st century depends on the ability of individuals to coalesce around shared goals, and harness the power of their convictions. But when governments crack down on the right of citizens to work together, as they have throughout history, societies fall into stagnation and decay.”

Clinton added that “Democracies don’t fear their own people.”  I imagine the guy in the Guy Fawkes mask would get a big laugh out of that.  For a government that doesn’t fear its own people, the U.S. “democracy” spends an awful lot of time obsessing over whether we’re ingesting prohibited substances into our own bodies, downloading songs, and other “terroristic” activities that it’s made its business.  Talk about paranoia!  “Now nothing will be withheld from them, which they have imagined to do.”

The shutdown of file-sharing sites will probably backfire, I’m afraid.  Such authoritarian actions by the Copyright Nazis and their government spear-carriers will, I fear, lead to an outcome that should alarm all good citizens.  Sadly, denial-of-service attacks against the websites of various government agencies, the RIAA and MPAA, have become increasingly frequent in recent years.  If you’re the kind of juvenile person who takes misguided pleasure in seeing bad things happen to some of the most wicked people in the world, just Google “DOS+attack RIAA+website.”   Shocking.

At one time the cat and mouse game between hackers and the RIAA got so intense that for a while the RIAA was constantly shifting its site around between low-profile servers, to protect itself from hackers (kind of like Saddam randomly sleeping in a different palace every night as an anti-assassination precaution).

The latest such incident was “Operation T*tstorm,” a distributed DOS attack by the hacker group “Anonymous” on the sites of the Australian Parliament and Ministry of Communications in retaliation for increased censorship of porn websites.

Thank God these poor misguided anti-social saps have mitigated the potential harm by focusing up till now on  the public websites of organizations they hate, instead of on the intranets on which their actual functioning as organizations depends.  I greatly fear that someday soon some utterly reprehensible sociopath will manage to do this, and when someone like Mitch Bainwol shows up at work and logs on to check his email, he’ll see nothing but a blank screen.

C4SS (c4ss.org) Research Associate Kevin Carson is a contemporary mutualist author and individualist anarchist whose written work includes Studies in Mutualist Political Economy, Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective, and The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto, all of which are freely available online. Carson has also written for such print publications as The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty and a variety of internet-based journals and blogs, including Just Things, The Art of the Possible, the P2P Foundation and his own Mutualist Blog.

10 comments

» Comments RSS Feed
  1. I must admit to being confused here. The RIAA and MPAA are doing terrible things, denying us of the freedoms we deserve, all that. But you disapprove of the retaliations against them?

    How should they be fought? Carefully worded letters sent to home offices to be systematically shredded after a form-letter response is mailed out? Or something more direct, a protest outside their home office. Maybe one that turns into a riot. Would you support it if a few windows got broken or something got lit on fire?

    If so, why not support the internet equivalents?

    I am interested in this seeming discord. Not angry and hopefully not insulting, but interested.

  2. Carlyle: Maybe I should have included the phrase "But that would be wrong."

  3. It's worth noting in the interests of spreading Good Information and factual clarity, that the blogetery shutdown had nothing to do with IP infringement. They were hosting a copy of "Inspire Magazine", which includes bomb making instructions. Furthermore, the FBI never asked burstnet to take the site down at all – the FBI merely asked burstnet to provide them with the contact information for the account owner who ran the blogetery.com virtual private server. Burstnet decided on their own to shut down the server and refund him.

  4. I, too, rue the day. What a horror such an outcome would be for our fragile, precious Democracy<sup>TM</sup>.

    BTW, be careful when you mention Sudafed<sup>® TM Reg. U.S. Pat. Ofc.</sup> without its qualifying regalia, or Johnson & Johnson just might sue your hiney.

  5. mdh: Thanks for the heads-up. I saw a story to that effect not long after this was posted. Well, then, I hope nobody does any of those awful things in response to Operation in Our Sites, or whatever sites "the Authorities" shut down for file-sharing next time, instead.

    Mike: Maybe they'll do a work-around and restore the law of seditious libel by trademarking the names of all government officials and policies so we can't talk about them.

  6. The sarcasm. It burns!

  7. In some places, here on the internets, we're such sardonic bastards that we absolutely must make use of the sarcasm tag or else everyone gets their feelings hurt all the time. Just end your rants with "/s" and every is in on the fun.

  8. Adrian: and yet some folks didn't catch on.

  9. Awesome article!

    ps: always use sarcasm tags because noone can tell when you're being sarcastic otherwise /sarc

  10. [...] Joe Lieberman’s “Internet Kill Switch” proposal to legislation allowing the government to control where your browser can go to the ACTA [...]

Leave a comment