<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honduras: Zelaya Agonistes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://c4ss.org/content/717/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://c4ss.org/content/717</link>
	<description>building awareness of the market anarchist alternative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:26:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: planetaryjim</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/717/comment-page-1#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>planetaryjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=717#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Tom, you write very well in this essay.  I agree with the conclusions you draw.

You say, &quot;Force exerted within &#039;the system,&#039; as well as the equal and opposite reactions to that force, will not change the amount of energy in, or the direction or velocity of, the system itself.&quot;

I&#039;m not sure that using the language of conservation of momentum or the language of conservation of energy is your best approach here.

I think, instead, you might say that while a single man may attempt to bend the system to his will, what actually gets bent is the man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Tom, you write very well in this essay.  I agree with the conclusions you draw.</p>
<p>You say, &#8220;Force exerted within &#8216;the system,&#8217; as well as the equal and opposite reactions to that force, will not change the amount of energy in, or the direction or velocity of, the system itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that using the language of conservation of momentum or the language of conservation of energy is your best approach here.</p>
<p>I think, instead, you might say that while a single man may attempt to bend the system to his will, what actually gets bent is the man.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
