<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mere Anarchy: Can A Society Without Government Be Better Run Than What We Have Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://c4ss.org/content/2973/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973</link>
	<description>building public awareness of left-wing market anarchism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 02:24:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iconoclast</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-157909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iconoclast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-157909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing I disagree with you about is Intellectual Property. I like all the rest, including your sci-fi! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing I disagree with you about is Intellectual Property. I like all the rest, including your sci-fi! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Neil Schulman</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-6329</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J Neil Schulman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-6329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeremy, 
 
I am not primarily a structuralist. Any form of organization is no better than the morals of the people who form it. Does that mean anarchistic organization requires angels? Nope. It only means that anarchy can only be preferable to more criminal types of organization -- such as states -- if it&#039;s operated along more ethical lines.  
 
I believe ethics have a utility and a practical value. If that makes me a utopian, so be it. 
 
Neil ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>I am not primarily a structuralist. Any form of organization is no better than the morals of the people who form it. Does that mean anarchistic organization requires angels? Nope. It only means that anarchy can only be preferable to more criminal types of organization &#8212; such as states &#8212; if it&#39;s operated along more ethical lines. </p>
<p>I believe ethics have a utility and a practical value. If that makes me a utopian, so be it.</p>
<p>Neil </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This seems to me to be no better than arguments for a government, in that people are required to be angels. &quot;But what if they were more ethical?&quot; Sure, and what if ice cream fell from the sky? 
 
Look, I&#039;m a libertarian through and through, but I think your rhetoric here needs some improvement. Anarchism will not function or come to pass because we just wish that people were more honorable. While there are honorable people out there (and I certainly don&#039;t buy the notion that all corporate employees are self-centered, greedy, unethical bastards) there are a *lot* of those who lack such standards. 
 
This is more of a rhetorical analysis than anything else. I like the sentiment here, but it&#039;s not going to go over well with anybody outside of C4SS. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to me to be no better than arguments for a government, in that people are required to be angels. &quot;But what if they were more ethical?&quot; Sure, and what if ice cream fell from the sky?</p>
<p>Look, I&#39;m a libertarian through and through, but I think your rhetoric here needs some improvement. Anarchism will not function or come to pass because we just wish that people were more honorable. While there are honorable people out there (and I certainly don&#39;t buy the notion that all corporate employees are self-centered, greedy, unethical bastards) there are a *lot* of those who lack such standards.</p>
<p>This is more of a rhetorical analysis than anything else. I like the sentiment here, but it&#39;s not going to go over well with anybody outside of C4SS. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mac</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neil, 
 
I know this response is a little late but just wanted to say I enjoyed the POV you brought up.  The more diverse and open the greater discussion is concerning all non-state options, the more we all benefit at the end of the day.  My thanks to you sir and my thanks to C4SS for publishing your thoughts. 
 
mac ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil,</p>
<p>I know this response is a little late but just wanted to say I enjoyed the POV you brought up.  The more diverse and open the greater discussion is concerning all non-state options, the more we all benefit at the end of the day.  My thanks to you sir and my thanks to C4SS for publishing your thoughts.</p>
<p>mac </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick Long</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roderick Long]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, you need to move in a wider gyre, then.  :-) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, you need to move in a wider gyre, then.  <img src="http://c4ss.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Morrison</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Morrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Roderick, but in my circles, &quot;academic&quot; has more stigma than &quot;anarchist.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Roderick, but in my circles, &quot;academic&quot; has more stigma than &quot;anarchist.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick Long</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roderick Long]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Lewis&#039;s description of what he means in the intro to &lt;em&gt;Mere Christianity&lt;/em&gt;, it&#039;s essentially &quot;Christianity Without Adjectives.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Lewis&#39;s description of what he means in the intro to <em>Mere Christianity</em>, it&#39;s essentially &quot;Christianity Without Adjectives.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmangum</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rmangum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;What Yeats meant was the end result of entropy; what Lewis and Baxter meant was core sustainable beliefs. Clearly I&#8217;m choosing to deal here with antithetical thoughts.&quot; 
 
What Yeats certainly, and Lewis and Baxter probably, meant by &quot;mere&quot; was the older meaning of the word, which was &quot;pure.&quot; What Yeats meant by &quot;anarchy&quot; was, as you point out, the popular but erroneous meaning of &quot;chaos.&quot; Hence, pure chaos. Lewis likewise (I haven&#039;t read the book) probably meant pure Christianity. But I like the adoption of &quot;mere anarchy&quot; in our sense, the positive one of pure freedom. It&#039;s anarchism with an adjective, but without the ubiquitous prefix. We could also adopt and transpose into our terms as a rallying cry, &quot;Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold,&quot; which shall indicate, not entropy and anomie, but secession and the collapse of centralized power.  
 
In my Econ 101 class I prefaced a paper on the Austrian theory of the business-cycle with the quote, &quot;Turning and turning in the widening gyre/ The falcon cannot hear the falconer.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What Yeats meant was the end result of entropy; what Lewis and Baxter meant was core sustainable beliefs. Clearly I&rsquo;m choosing to deal here with antithetical thoughts.&quot;</p>
<p>What Yeats certainly, and Lewis and Baxter probably, meant by &quot;mere&quot; was the older meaning of the word, which was &quot;pure.&quot; What Yeats meant by &quot;anarchy&quot; was, as you point out, the popular but erroneous meaning of &quot;chaos.&quot; Hence, pure chaos. Lewis likewise (I haven&#39;t read the book) probably meant pure Christianity. But I like the adoption of &quot;mere anarchy&quot; in our sense, the positive one of pure freedom. It&#39;s anarchism with an adjective, but without the ubiquitous prefix. We could also adopt and transpose into our terms as a rallying cry, &quot;Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold,&quot; which shall indicate, not entropy and anomie, but secession and the collapse of centralized power. </p>
<p>In my Econ 101 class I prefaced a paper on the Austrian theory of the business-cycle with the quote, &quot;Turning and turning in the widening gyre/ The falcon cannot hear the falconer.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the term &quot;libertarian&quot; may encompass anarchists, it&#039;s too big an umbrella to stop there. Limited govt types &amp; minarchists are libs too. I often describe myself as a libertarian anarchist. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the term &quot;libertarian&quot; may encompass anarchists, it&#39;s too big an umbrella to stop there. Limited govt types &amp; minarchists are libs too. I often describe myself as a libertarian anarchist. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick Long</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/2973/comment-page-1#comment-2454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roderick Long]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 02:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=2973#comment-2454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Joseph Peden&#039;s articles &lt;a href=&quot;http://mises.org/journals/lf/1971/1971_04.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; (p.3) and &lt;a href=&quot;http://mises.org/journals/jls/1_2/1_2_1.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, or Gerard Casey &lt;a href=&quot;http://mises.org/journals/jls/22_1/22_1_2.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Joseph Peden&#39;s articles <a href="http://mises.org/journals/lf/1971/1971_04.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a> (p.3) and <a href="http://mises.org/journals/jls/1_2/1_2_1.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>, or Gerard Casey <a href="http://mises.org/journals/jls/22_1/22_1_2.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
