<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Six Theses of Libertarian Rhetoric</title>
	<atom:link href="http://c4ss.org/content/1057/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://c4ss.org/content/1057</link>
	<description>building awareness of the market anarchist alternative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:43:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Markley</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/1057/comment-page-1#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>John Markley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=1057#comment-818</guid>
		<description>What planetaryjim said.  The first time I ever won someone over to libertarianism was in high school, when I had a friend- who was kind of a Ralph Nader type at the time- I would discuss politics with.  What convinced him was talking about all the state interventions that disproportionately hurt poor people, and especially protectionism and barriers to employment and entrepeneurship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->What planetaryjim said.  The first time I ever won someone over to libertarianism was in high school, when I had a friend- who was kind of a Ralph Nader type at the time- I would discuss politics with.  What convinced him was talking about all the state interventions that disproportionately hurt poor people, and especially protectionism and barriers to employment and entrepeneurship.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: planetaryjim</title>
		<link>http://c4ss.org/content/1057/comment-page-1#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>planetaryjim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://c4ss.org/?p=1057#comment-815</guid>
		<description>Indeed on point 3.  For who has greater need of strong protection for private property than the poor, who suffer most when they lose what they own?  And who has greater need of the lower prices brought on by highly competitive free markets?  The poor need stable or lowering prices in order to make the most of their meager means.  And who has greater need of the opportunities available in a truly free market?  The poor need these opportunities to raise their income level.  

The rich seem to demand protection from ever having to work hard, or at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- google_ad_section_start -->Indeed on point 3.  For who has greater need of strong protection for private property than the poor, who suffer most when they lose what they own?  And who has greater need of the lower prices brought on by highly competitive free markets?  The poor need stable or lowering prices in order to make the most of their meager means.  And who has greater need of the opportunities available in a truly free market?  The poor need these opportunities to raise their income level.  </p>
<p>The rich seem to demand protection from ever having to work hard, or at all.<!-- google_ad_section_end --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
